 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Fri Jun 16th, 2006 |
| Location: | New London, Connecticut USA |
| Posts: | 902 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
So there you go. Too short is always preferable to too long in my book.
--kato
| View single post by katoagogo | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Oct 2nd, 2010 11:10 pm |
|
||||||||||||
katoagogo
|
I've been perfectly happy with a bunch of 65 or 70 minute intermissionless full-length plays - and have not felt cheated at all by the length. I have also not returned after a 70 minute first act that seemed bloated and dull and found that I'd rather have a beer than return for another hour of slow-moving angst. For those overlong plays I have felt ill-used because my time and money were ill-spent. So there you go. Too short is always preferable to too long in my book. --kato
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||